IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 18724/2025 Decided on: 10.12.2025 Kundan Lal …Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & Ors. .…Respondents. ………………………………………………………………………………. Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Harmohan Thakur, Advocate vice Mr. Mehar Chand Thakur, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Y.P.S.Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General for respondents No. 1 to 3. Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, Advocate, for respondent No.4. Jyotsna Rewal Dua , J Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, learned Additional Advocate General and Mr. Tara Chand Chauhan, learned counsel, appear and waive service of notice on behalf of respondents No. 1 to 3 and respondent No.4, respectively. 2. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, the matter is heard at this stage. 3. Petitioner seeks applicability of Balo Devi & others versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others2, as according to 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2Civil Appeal No.4792 of 2022, decided on 18.07.2022. 2 him, applicability of this decision would made him entitled to pension. It is, however, seen from the record that the petitioner has not preferred any representation for the redressal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring a representation within two weeks from today. In case such a representation is so made, the same shall be decided by the competent authority in accordance with law as well as taking into consideration the above judgment within a period of six weeks thereafter. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge 10th December, 2025(yogesh)