1 2025:CGHC:6400 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3233 of 2019 • Pyare Lal Kori Son of Shri Puna Ram Kori, Aged About 72 Years, Occupation Cultivator, Resident of Village Kura, P.H. No. 89/3, Revenue Circle and Dharsiwa, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner Versus 1. State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department of Revenue, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 2. The Collector Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4. The Tahsildar, Tahsil Dharsiwa, District Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. G.M. Hasan, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Agrawal, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 04/02/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call for the entire record pertaining to the case of the petitioner's pond in the interest of justice. 10.2 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to set-aside impugned order dated (Annexure- P/2) passed by the Learned S.D.O. Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) in case no. 1/A- 71/2018-19 and also may kindly be pleased to make a direction to enter the name of the petitioner in the revenue records as a owner of the pond in the interest of justice. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI 2 10.3 Any other relief which may be suitable in the case and circumstances of the case, may also be granted.” 2. I have perused the impugned order (Annexure P-2) dated 31.12.2018. 3. According to the provisions of Section 44(2) of the CG Land Revenue Code, 1959, there is an efficacious statutory alternative remedy available to the petitioner to prefer an appeal before the appellate forum against the order dated 31.12.2018 passed by the Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Raipur. Therefore, I am not inclined to entertain this petition. 4. Consequently, the petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner would be at liberty to prefer an appeal before the appellate forum. 5. The certified copy of the impugned order be returned to the petitioner after retaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti