APHC010621282017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3506] FRIDAY,THE FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 499/2017 Between: 1. THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO LTD, REP.BY ITS DIVISIOBNAL MANAGER, KURNOOL. DIVISIOBNAL MANAGER THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE CO.LTD., KURNOOL. ...APPELLANT AND 1. BALIJA CHINNA MADDILETY ANR, S/O.SUBBAIAH, DRIVER, R/O H.NO.44/23, NANDYAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 2. Y SIVASANKAR REDDY, S/O.MAHANANDI REDDY, R/O.H.NO.25/28, SANJEEVANAGAR, NANDYAL, ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal Under Section_____against ordersallow the appeal IA NO: 1 OF 2004(CMAMP 16011 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased condone the delay of 43 days in filing the appeal against the orders passed in W.C.No.8 of 2002, dated 20.8.2004, on the file of Hon'ble Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Asst. Commissioner of Labour, at Kurnool IA NO: 2 OF 2004(CMAMP 16060 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased stay the execution orders passed in W.V.No.8 of 2002, dated 20.8.2004, on the file of Hon'ble Commissioner for Workmen's Compensation and Asst. Commissionmer of Labour, at Kurnool, pending the final disposal of the main appeal 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2005(CMAMP 892 OF 2005 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased vacate the interim stay granted in CMP.NO.16060/04 in CMASR.NO.65459/04 on 9-12-04 Counsel for the Appellant: 1. V RAGHU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. U RAMANJANEYULU The Court made the following: 3 The Court made the following Judgment: This Court has passed the following order on 18.07.2025:- “This Court on 09.02.2015 permitted learned counsel for the appellant to take steps against legal heirs of respondent No.1 within four (04) weeks, with default clause of dismissal. As no steps were taken, by order dated 26.06.2015, the appeal against the 1st respondent was directed to be dismissed automatically. However, the appeal came to be numbered in 2017. As per the earlier orders, since steps were not taken and appeal stood dismissed automatically against respondent No.1, learned counsel for the appellant seeks time to verify the same. List the matter on 25.07.2025 under the caption ‘for orders’.” 2. Today, learned counsel for the appellant as per the instructions from his client submits that whereabouts of respondent No.1 could not be ascertained inspite of best efforts. 3. In view of the same, the Civil Miscellaneous Appeal stands dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ______________________________________ JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN Date: 01.08.2025 SCS 4 61 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 499/2017 Date:- 01.08.2025 SCS