Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3716 (UTT)

VARSHA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPCRL/434/2020 · 2025-06-18

Pankaj Purohit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPCRL No. 434 of 2020 Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. Mr. Mohd. Faizan proxy counsel for Mr. Mohd. Safdar, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. Mr. B.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State. 3. Learned State Counsel, on instructions, has made a statement at the Bar that the investigation has been completed and the final report was submitted by the Investigating Officer on 19.04.2020. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners does not dispute the submission made by the learned State Counsel. 5. In view of the above statement, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the present writ petition, and the same has become infructuous. Accordingly, the criminal writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. (Pankaj Purohit, J.) 18.06.2025 Mamta