Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3716 (GAU)

SAHADUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS

WP(C)/5822/2025 · 2026-07-30

Sanjay Kumar Medhi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010221632025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/5822/2025 SAHADUL ISLAM S/O- MEHER ALI, RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KUNTIRCHAR PART- II, P.O. FALIMARI, PS DHUBRI, DIST DHUBRI, ASSAM, PIN 783325. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, PANCHAYAT AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GHY-6. 2:THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PARISHAD DHUBRI ASSAM 3:THE EXECUTIVE OFFICER THE DHARMASALA ANCHALIK PANCHAYAT DHARMASALA DIST- DHUBRI ASSAM 4:THE PRESIDENT FALIMARI GAON PANCHAYAT FALIMARI DISTRICT DHUBRI ASSAM 5:THE SECRETARY FALIMARI GAON PANCHAYAT DISTRICT- DHUBRI ASSAM Page No.# 2/3 6:THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER DHARMASALA DEVELOPMENT BLOCK DHUBRI 7:THE DISTRICT COMMISSONER DISTRICT- DHUBRI ASSAM 8:NUR ISLAM MIA S/O- LATE BECEHU MIA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE KUNTIR CHAR PART- II P.O. FALIMARI P.S. AND DISTRICT- DHUBRI ASSAM PIN- 783325 Advocate for the Petitioner : MS. S B CHOUDHURY, MR A N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, P AND R.D. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MEDHI ORDER 31.07.2026 Heard Ms. SB Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Shri S. Dutta, learned Standing Counsel, Panchayat & Rural Development Department and Ms. U. Das, learned State Counsel. The challenge in this petition was against an NIT dated 19.08.2025 for settlement of Majerchar via Kuntirchar to Dhubri Parghat by the Falimari Gaon Panchayat. Ms. Choudhury, learned counsel for the petitioner has however submitted that the period of settlement is over and she would not like to press this writ petition any further. The aforesaid submission has not been opposed by the learned counsel for Page No.# 3/3 the respondents. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of as being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant