[2025:RJ-JP:46507] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 12027/2025 Chhotelal Alias Bhagwan Sahai S/o Prahlad, Aged About 43 Years, R/o Balahedi, Police Station Balahedi, District Dausa (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail, Dausa (Raj.) ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr. Veerendra Singh, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP Mr. Umesh Vyas, Adv. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 18/11/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No. 133/2025 registered at Police Station Mehandipur Balaji, District Dausa for the offence(s) under Sections 189(2), 115(2), 126(2), 3(5), 333, 109(1) of BNS and Section 3/25 and 5 of Arms Act. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the applicant is aged approximately 43 years. It is submitted that the applicant is neither named in the FIR nor is having any connection with the property in dispute. It is also submitted that the alleged injuries are simple in nature. It is further submitted that the challan has been filed and the applicant is in custody ever since [2025:RJ-JP:46507] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-12027/2025] 02.09.2025. It is also submitted that the applicant is having a criminal antecedent in which he is bailed out. 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the prohibition order was also passed against the applicant, howsoever, it is not refuted that the applicant’s name is not there in the FIR. 4. Heard and considered. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the parties, considering that the applicant is not named in the FIR; that the charge-sheet has been filed, that trial will take a long time and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case and material on record but without commenting on merits/demerits of the case, this court is inclined to allow the bail application of the accused-applicant and enlarge him on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that accused-applicant Chhotelal Alias Bhagwan Sahai S/o Prahlad shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing as and when called upon to do so. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /39