CRM-M-15795-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 246 CRM-M-15795-2025 Date of Decision: 09.04.2025 SUKHWINDER SINGH @ LADDA AND ANOTHER ... PETITIONERS VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB ... RESPONDENT CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S.GREWAL Present:- Mr. D.S. Randhawa, Advocate for Mr. Amandeep Singh Manaise, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Kamalpreet Bawa, AAG, Punjab H.S. Grewal, J. 1. Both the petitioners are seeking anticipatory bail in case bearing FIR No. 36 dated 06.09.2024, under Sections 118 (1), 191 (3), 190 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (Section 118(2) Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita added lateron) registered at Police Station Ghuman Kalan, District Gurdaspur. 2. Allegations, in brief, are that both the petitioners alongwith 07 other co-accused have assaulted the complainant. It is alleged that petitioner No.1-Sukhwinder Singh @ Ladda gave a dattar blow on his left forearm and Sarwan Singh @ Sabi gave dattar blow causing injuries on his left leg near the knee and thumb of his left hand. The motive for causing the injuries is that both the petitioners, who were apprehended by the police on suspicion of selling drugs and they suspected that the complainant has informed the police. DINESH KUMAR 2025.04.22 12:30 I am the author of this document at the bottom of left side CRM-M-15795-2025 -2- 3. Learned State counsel has opposed the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioners as serious allegations are levelled against them with regard to the crime and prays that their custodial interrogation is required. 4. After hearing learned counsel for the parties, this court is of the opinion that no ground is made out to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, at this stage, at this, as the petitioners have caused grievous injuries to the complainant and their custodial interrogation is required to carry out effective investigation and to recover the weapon used in the offence. Keeping in view the gravity of offence, the petitioners do not deserve the concession of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the same is hereby dismissed.. 5. Dismissed. (H.S.GREWAL) 09.04.2025 JUDGE dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DINESH KUMAR 2025.04.22 12:30 I am the author of this document at the bottom of left side