Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37151 (JHR)

MALTI DEVI v. CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR,

WPC/6137/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:33664 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI WP(S) No.6137 of 2025 ----- Malti Devi, wife of Anil Ray, aged about 47 years Resident of Marasi Mohalla, Upper Dhoura, P.O. & P.S.-Bhurkunda, District- Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829135 … Petitioner(s). Versus (1) Central Coalfields Limited through its Chairman-cum- Managing Director, Darbhanga House, P.S.-Kotwali, P.O.- Ranchi, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001. (2) The Director (H.R.), Central Coalfields Limited, Darbhanga House, P.S.-Kotwali, P.O.-Ranchi, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand- 834001. (3) The Director Personnel, C.C.L., Darbhanga House, P.S.- Kotwali, P.O.-Ranchi, District Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001. (4) The General Manager (P&I), Central Coalfield Limited, Darbhanga House, P.S.-Kotwali, P.O.-Ranchi, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001 (5) The General Manager, BRK-SYL area, C.C.L, Sayal 'D', P.O.- Siyal & P.S.-Patratu, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829125 (6) The Project Officer, Bhurkunda Colliery, C.C.L., P.O. & P.S.- Bhurkunda, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829135. (7) The Personnel Officer, Bhurkunda Colliery, C.C.L., P.O. & P.S.-Bhurkunda, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829135. (8) The Deputy Manager (HR), Bhurkunda Colliery, C.C.L., P.O. & P.S.-Bhurkunda, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829135. (9) Malti Devi wife of Upendra Rai Resident Village-Jawahar Nagar, P.S.-O.P. Bhurkunda, P.O.-Patratu, District-Ramgarh, Jharkhand-829125 at present H. No. 103, Chaprasi Quarter, Patel Nagar, P.O. & P.S.-Bhur unda, Dist-Ramgarh. … Respondent(s). CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Afaque Rashidi, Advocate For the CCL : Mr. Abhishek Choudhary, Advocate Mr. Aalok Kumar, Advocate …...... 02 /11.11.2025: Heard the parties. 2. The petitioner in this writ petition has prayed to direct the respondents to take a final decision on the complaint dated 08.09.2025 which was received by the Central Coalfields Limited in respect of an appointment given to one Smt. Malti Devi who according to the petitioner has obtained employment by impersonation. 2025:JHHC:33664 2 3. It is the case of the petitioner that the petitioner was formally known as Roushan Ara and later on married to Anil Ray who was employee of Central Coalfields Limited thereafter she changed her name as Malti Devi. After the death of Anil Ray, it is the allegation of the petitioner that another individual namely Malti Devi impersonating herself who actually is the wife of Upendra Rai has obtained employment for her son by representing herself as the widow of Anil Ray. The petitioner’s claim is that the petitioner had objected to the said appointment and also filed a representation before the respondents. 4. Considering the submission of the parties and the peculiar facts of this case, this Court cannot enquire the issue of impersonation. 5. It is better if the petitioner files a fresh representation before the General Manager (P&I)-respondent no. 4 who will consider the representation of the petitioner after giving proper opportunity of hearing to all the interested parties including the respondent no.9. 6. The respondents should take a decision on the representation of the petitioner within a period of 16 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order intimating their decision to all the parties within the aforesaid period. 7. Be it noted that this Court has not entered into the merits of this Case. 8. This writ petition is disposed of. (ANANDA SEN, J.) 11.11.2025 Tanuj/CP-2