Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37150 (PNJ)

CHANDERKALA AND ORS v. RAJ SINGH AND ORS

RSA/2229/2022 · 2025-09-17

Nidhi Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 252 Smt. Chanderkala and others Raj Singh and CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. 22 and 26 is taken on record. 2. that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal. 3. 4. 5. 17.09.2025 rishu IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA Date of Decision: 1 Smt. Chanderkala and others Versus Raj Singh and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for respondents No. 13, 14, 21, 22 and 36. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No. 22 and 26 is taken on record. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal. Permitted to do so. Dismissed as withdrawn. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2229-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.09.2025 .… Appellants .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA . Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the appellants. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for respondents No. 13, 14, 21, 22 and 36. Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No. 13, 14, 21, counsel for the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 13, 14, 21, counsel for the appellants submits RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.