Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
252
Smt. Chanderkala and others
Raj Singh and
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Present: -
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
1.
22 and 26 is taken on record.
2.
that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal.
3.
4.
5.
17.09.2025 rishu
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
RSA Date of Decision: 1
Smt. Chanderkala and others
Versus
Raj Singh and others
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA
Mr. Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the appellants.
Mr. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate
for respondents No. 13, 14, 21, 22 and 36.
NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL)
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No. 22 and 26 is taken on record.
At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal.
Permitted to do so.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .09.2025
Whether speaking/reasoned
Whether Reportable
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2229-2022 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.09.2025
.… Appellants
.... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA . Sumit Sangwan, Advocate for the appellants. Sushil Sheoran, Advocate for respondents No. 13, 14, 21, 22 and 36.
Vakalatnama filed on behalf of respondents No. 13, 14, 21, counsel for the appellants submits that he may be permitted to withdraw the present second appeal. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of.
( NIDHI GUPTA )
JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No
Yes/No
13, 14, 21, counsel for the appellants submits RISHU KATARIA 2025.09.18 15:31 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this
order/judgment.