IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE k( o m a to PRESENT o THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6707 OF 2023 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein, the High Court may be pleased to summon, try and punish the Respondents herein for willfully not implementing the Order dated 28,6.2023 in W.P.No.14895 of 2023. Between; Dr P Brahmananda Rao, S/o Late Peeraiah, aged about 62 years. Retired Joint Director of Treasuries and Accounts (former Finance Controller, Sarva Siksha Abhiyan, Rajiv Vidya Mission) R/o H.No. H.No.S 1, Aditya Vardhana Enclave, KVR Estates, Koradapeta, Vizianagaram ...Petitioner AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Special Chief Secretary, School Education Department at A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 2 Shri S.S.Rawat, I.A.S., Special Chief Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh, at A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 3. The State Project Director, Rajiv Vidya Mission (erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh) at Hyderabad 4. Shri N.Mohan Rao, Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Mangalagiri, Guntur District 5. Shri J.Sathyanarayana, A.P.Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. I.P.S., Commissioner of Inquiries (Retd.) ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s M VIDYAVATHI Counsel for the Respondents: SRI G V S KISHORE KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents: SMT R SUDHA RANI The Court made the following order: APHC010507522022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) . -if.- [3331] '■'U, \ • WEDNESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 6707/2023 Between: Dr P Brahmananda Rao ...PETITIONER AND State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: % 1.M VIDYAVATHI Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.G VS KISHORE KUMAR 2. 3.RSUDHARANI The Court made the following order: The above contempt case is filed complaining of non-compliance of the order dated 28.06.2023 in W.P.No.14895 of 2023. The petitioner filed the above writ petition to declare the action of the respondents in not considering the representation dated 26.12.2022, on 05.06.2023, made by the petitioner for grant of all service benefits i.e. treating \ the suspension period as on duty, consequential terminal benefits, including the increments and pension, etc., as illegal and arbitrary. 2. The said writ petition was disposed of on 28.06.2023. The operative 0 portion of the order reads as under; 3. “...directing the respondents to complete and conclude the disciplinary proceedings/enquiry expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of said order and take appropriate action as per the final result. If for any reason, the respondents are unable to conclude the disciplinary proceedings within three (03) months, the respondents shall pay and release all retirement benefits and pension to the petitioner forthwith.” In the affidavit filed in support of the contempt case, it was pleadeif that the order dated 28.06.2023 has not been implemented. 4. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Smt. P. Saraswathi, learned counsel representing Sri G.V.S. Kishore Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents, submitted instructions of the Director, Treasuries and Accounts Department, A.P., Mangalagiri. As seen from the instructions, the petitioner was paid GIS of Rs.96,041/- on 12.09.2024, GPF of Rs.6,99,251/- on 04.05.2021, commutation (composite share) of Rs.19,35,552/- on 14.04.2025, Commutation (A.P share) of Rs.2,67,320/- on 14.04.2025, Gratuity of Rs.10,54,379/- and 1,45,621/- on 29.04.2025 and an amount of Rs.49,900/- and 1,69,896/- towards encashment of earned leave, on 29.04.2025. 5. The instructions further disclose that the regular normal pension as per the eligibility is also being paid to the petitioner. 6. Thus, as seen from the instructions, the retirement benefits have been paid to the petitioner on different dates. 7. 8. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that some of the increments have not been paid, however, endorsed concerning the payment of retirement benefits. ✓ ) Given the above instructions, since the respondents t;omplied with the order dated 28.06.2023, by paying the amount, though some delay occurred, in the considered opinion of this court, the respondents did not commit any contempt by not implementing the order dated 28.06.2023 in W.P.No.14895 of 2023. 9. 10. Therefore, this contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATARAO DEPU1]^EGISTRAR SECTION OFFICER //TRUE COPY// To, 1 State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by its Special Chief Secreta^, Education Department at A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District 9 «;hri S S Rawat IA S Special Chief Secretary, Finance Department, lovernmJ^t of Andhra PradLh, at A P Secretariat, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District. 3. The State Project Director, Rajiv Vidya Mission (erstwhile State of Andhra Pradesh) at Hyderabad 4. Shri N.Mohan Rao, Director of Treasuries and Accounts, Mangalagiri, Guntur District Commissioner of Inquiries (Retd.) I.P.S., 5. Shri J.Sathyanarayana, A.P.Secretariat, Amaravathi, Guntur Dist. 6. One CC to M/s. M Vidyavathi Advocate [OPUC] 7. One CC to Sri G V S Kishore Kumar Advocate [OPUC] 8. OneCCto Smt R Sudha Rani Advocate [OPUC] 9. Three CD Copies Pmg 1 • ;3«*; HIGH COURT DATED;07/05/2025 ORDER CC.No.6707 of 2023 ^ 0 5AUG 2025 ^^^^sClgrant Sectjojix^^ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE