Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37149 (CHH)

BALKRISHNA CHOUHAN v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

MCC/789/2025 · 2025-08-05

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:39005 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 789 of 2025 Balkrishna Chouhan S/o Dharam Singh Chouhan Aged About 31 Years (Assistant Director (Sarve)) Town And Country Planning Area Ambikapur, District Sarguja (C.G.) Present Address- Office Of Joint Director Town And Country Planning, Bilaspur District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Town And Country Planning, Indravati Bhawan Block No. 4, 3rd Floor, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Director Directorate, Town And Country Planning, Naya Raipur Atal Nagar, Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Joint Director Town And Country Planning, New Composite Building, Collector Premises, Bilaspur (C.G.) 4 - Assistant Director Town And Country Planning (Sarve), Regional Office, Ambikapur (C.G.) ...Respondents (Cause title is taken from the CIS) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ For Applicant : Shri Aditya Khare, Advocate For Respondents/State : Shri Arvind Dubey, GA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 06.08.2025 1. This is an application for modification of order dated 17.07.2025, passed in WPS- 7273 of 2025. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant/petitioner is holding the post of Assistant Director (Survey), Town and Country Planning Area, Ambikapur, District-Surguja, and he has challenged his suspension order dated 17.05.2024 in WPS-7273 of 2025. Due to typographical mistake, in Digitally signed by V PADMAVATHI Date: 2025.08.07 10:44:55 +0530 Mcc 789 of 2025 2 paragraph-1 (2nd line) of the order dated 17.07.2025, “Assistant Draftsman” has been typed, whereas, correct designation of the applicant is “ Assistant Director”. Therefore, order dated 17.07.2025 requires modification. 3. Learned State counsel has no objection. 4. Considering the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, and also from perusal of the pleading, application for modification of order dated 17.07.2025 passed in WPS-7273 of 2025 is allowed. 5. In paragraph-1 of the above order, “Assistant Draftsman” be read/substituted as “Assistant Director” and rest of the order dated 17.07.2025 passed in WPS-7273 of 2025 shall remain intact. 6. Copy of this order be placed in WPS-7273 of 2025, and be read as part of order dated 17.07.2025. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) JUDGE padma