GUNASEKARAN v. The State rep by The Inspector of Police
CRL OP/11741/2025 · 2025-04-23
G K Ilanthiraiyan
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37135 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37135 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 23.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2025 and Crl.M.P.Nos.7815 and 7817 of 2025 Gunasekaran ... Petitioner Vs The State rep by The Inspector of Police, R-9, Valasaravakkam Police Station, Chennai 600087. Crime No 78/2022. ... Respondent PRAYER: Criminal Original Petition is filed under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023/Section 482 of Cr.P.C, to set aside the docket order dated 04.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.Sr.No.142 of 2025 in S.C.No.108 of 2023 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee. For Petitioner : Mr.M.Arul For Respondent : Mr.A.Gopinath Government Advocate (Crl.Side)
ORDER This Criminal Original Petition has been filed challenging the docket
order dated 04.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.Sr.No.142 of 2025 in S.C.No.108 of 2023 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee, thereby https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2025 returned the application on the ground that the petitioner is not entitled for the copy of CD and CCTV footages, since they are electronic devices.
2. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner is unable to explain what is the CCTV footage required by the accused. Without knowing the place of the CCTV footage, the petitioner had mechanically filed this petition only to drag the proceedings. That apart, the petitioner is the son and he had murdered his own father. Therefore, the copy of the CD and CCTV footages could not be furnished to the petitioner and the application filed by petitioner was rightly rejected by the Court below and this Court finds no infirmity or illegality in the
order dated 04.03.2025 in Crl.M.P.Sr.No.142 of 2025 in S.C.No.108 of 2023 on the file of the III Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee.
4. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous petitions are closed. 23.04.2025 Internet:Yes Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non speaking order mn https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2025 To
1. The III Additional District and Sessions Court, Poonamallee.
2. The Inspector of Police, R-9, Valasaravakkam Police Station, Chennai 600087.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2025 G.K.ILANTHIRAIYAN. J, mn Crl.O.P.No.11741 of 2025 23.04.2025 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis