2025:JHHC:30130 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(S) No. 4185 of 2019 1. Dhiran Mahto, aged about 35 years, son of SohanMahto, resident of 180, Vill-Tantri (North Tantri) PunarwasKshetra, PO. Tantri. P.S. Jaridih, District- Bokaro, PIN 829301, Jharkhand. 2. Krishna Chandra Mahto, aged about 43 years, son of Kartik Mahto, resident of Vill-Kundouri, P.O Tupkadih, Chas, Near-Durga Mandir, Jugidih, B.S City, R.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro, PIN 827010, Jharkhand. 3. Bijay Kumar Sao aged about 34 years, son of Bhola Sao, resident of Vill-Kundori, P.O. Tupkadih, P.S. Balidih, Kanrra, District - Bokaro, PIN 827010, Jharkhand. 4. Raja Rajnish, aged about 36 years, son of Jawaharlal Mahto, resident of Vill - Kundori, shibutand. P.O. Tupkadih, Baradi, District-Bokaro, PIN 827010, Jharkhand. 5. Amit Kumar Puri, aged about 31 years, son of Raj KishorPuri, resident of Vill-Kundori, Near-Durga Mandir, P.O. Kundori, Jugidi, District-Bokaro, PIN 827010, Jharkhand. 6. Sekhar Kumar Mahto, aged about 32 years, son of Saryu Prasad Mahto, resident of Vill- Tantri north, P.O. Tantri, P.S. Jaridih, Tantri, District - Bokaro, PIN 829144, Jharkhand. 7. Birendra Kumar Mahto, aged about 36 years, son of TejuLalMahto, resident of Vill-Kundori, (Niche Tola), P.O. Kundori, Jugidih, B.S City, R.S. Bokaro, District- Bokaro, PIN 827010, Jharkhand. ... … Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, PO & PS Bokaro, District Bokaro 3. Sub - Divisional Officer, Chas, P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District Bokaro. 4. Steel Authority of India Limited, through its Managing Director, HRD Centre, Bokaro Steel City, Bokaro P.O. & P.S. Bokaro, District-Bokaro. 5 Bokaro Steel Limited, through Managing Director Personnel Administrative Reform Department, PO & PS Bokaro, District - Bokaro. ... … Respondent(s) CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Verma, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. Rishi Bharati, AC to AAG-III -------- 2025:JHHC:30130 2 Order No.9 /Dated: 25th September 2025 The instant writ application has been preferred by the petitioners for the following reliefs: “1i. For issuance of an appropriate writ/writs, order/ orders, direction/directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondents, more particularly Respondent No.5 to immediately and forthwith consider the candidature of these petitioners for being appointed on any suitable post considering the fact that they are the displaced persons i.e., persons whose land has been acquired by the Respondents, for expansion of project namely Oil Retention Pond and for construction of SMS-III site, and also considering the fact that they have successfully undergone the requisite ITI training imparted by Respondent No.5, meant and designed for providing employment to these petitioner. ii. For issuance of an appropriate writ/ writs, order/orders, direction/directions or a writ in the nature of mandamus commanding upon the respondent BSL to declare the result of all the advertised post of 124 Attendant-cum-Technician trainee whose examination has been conducted way back in the year 2016, and even result of 59 persons has been declared and offered appointment; and as such, not to discriminate the case of these petitioners to that of other similarly situated displaced persons whose land has also been acquired along with these petitioner, but pursuant to their successful training, they have been given appointment and are inducted in service; and the case of the petitioners are being discriminated arbitrarily and illegally. AND/OR iii. Pass such other writ/writs, direction/directions, as Your Lordships may deem fit and proper in this case.” 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that interest of justice would be sufficed by giving liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the concerned respondents and they may be directed to consider the case of the petitioners under land loser scheme. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents does not have any objection to the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Having regard to the aforesaid submission, the instant writ application is hereby disposed of by directing the petitioners to approach the concerned respondents by filing respective representations. The concerned respondent on receiving the representation of the petitioners, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to these petitioners and verification of the records, shall pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law and applicable rules and regulation and the records available with them. The entire exercise shall be completed within a period 2025:JHHC:30130 3 of 16 weeks from the date of receipt of the respective representations. 5. Pending I.As, if any, also stand disposed of. (Deepak Roshan, J.) 25.09.2025 Amit