Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37125 (AP)

VELDHI VISWANADHAM v. VELIDHI RAJESWARI(DIED)

CRP/3349/2023 · 2025-06-30

T C D Sekhar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010619592023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY.THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3349 OF 2023 Between: 1. Veldhi Viswanadham, S/o late Ramamurthy aged 70 years hindu,cultivation, R/at G.Sigadam Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District ...PETITIONER AND 1. Velidhi Rajeswari, died 2. Velidhi Nagaraju, S/o late Keswava Rao, aged 45 years, cultivation, R/at G.Sigadam Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District. 3. Veldhi Haranadh Baba, S/o Late Kesava Rao, aged 45 years, cultivation, R/at G.Sigadam Village 8t Mandal, Srikakulam District. 4. Velidhi Venkata Narayana, S/o Late Kesava Rao aged 40 years, cultivation, R/at G.Sigadam Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District. 5. Velidhi Madhuri, D/o Late Kesava Rao, aged 45 years, teacher, R/at G.Sigadam Village and Mandal, Srikakulam District. 6. Akari Indira, W/o Anantha Rao, aged 45 years, house wife. Residing at Rajam Town and Mandal, Srikakulam District. 'F 7. Adimuia Anuradha, W/o Suresh, aged 42 years, house wife, R/at Bhopal Town and District, Madhya Pradesh State. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to Allow the present C.R.P. by setting aside the order passed by the court of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajam in I.A.No.394/2022 in A.S.No.08/2019, dated 30.09.2023. lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in A.S.No.08/2019 on the file of Senior Civil Judge, Rajam, pending disposal of the C.R.P : SRI RELLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Petitioner Counsel for the Respondents : SRI A RAVI SHANKAR The Court made the following ORDER : APHC010619592023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3349/202^ [3505] Between: 1.VELDHI VISWANADHAM, S/0 LATE RAMAMURTHY AGED 70 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION, R/AT G.SIGADAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1.VELIDHI RAJESWARI (DIED) 2.VELIDHI NAGARAJU, S/0 LATE KESWAVA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/AT G.SIGADAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3.VELIDHI HARANADH BABA, S/0 LATE KESAVA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/AT G.SIGADAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4.VELIDHI VENKATA NARAYANA, S/0 LATE KESAVA RAO, AGED 40 YEARS, CULTIVATION, R/AT G.SIGADAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5.VELIDHI MADHURI, D/0 LATE KESAVA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, TEACHER, R/AT G.SIGADAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6.AKARI INDIRA, W/0 ANANTHA RAO, AGED 45 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, RESIDING AT RAJAM TOWN AND MANDAL SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7.ADIMUIA ANURADHA, W/0 SURESH, AGED 42 YEARS HOUSE WIFE, R/AT BHOPAL TOWN AND DISTRICT’ MADHYA PRADESH STATE. ... ...RESPONDENT(S) Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the present C.R.P. by setting aside the order passed by the Court of the Senior Civil Judge, Rajam in I.A.No.394/2022 in A.S.No.08/2019, dated 30.09.2023. 4 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.RELLI SURYANARAYANA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.A RAVI SHANKAR 2.- The Court made the following: V THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3349 nf 709'^ ORDER: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive and it has become infructuous. The said submission is placed on record. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. as As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if shall stand closed. any. SD/- K.J.RAJA BABU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR It" //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Civil Judge, (Senior Division) Rajam. 2. One CC to SRI. RELLI SURYANARAYANA Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. A RAVI SHANKAR Advocate [OPUC] 4. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 5. Three CD Copies SD TAC 4 HIGH COURT DATED:01/07/2025 ORDER CRP NO. 3349 OF 2023 sro£ g( 2 <1 SEP 2025 rrentSectioiix^5 O', ml Co^ DISMISSED THE CIVIL REVISION AS INFRUCTUOUS