1 2025:CGHC:41931 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8600 of 2025 1 - Shantilal Rathore S/o Shri Umendram Aged About 65 Years R/o Raman Nagar, Ward No. 18, Janjgir, Tehsil Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District Raipur C.G. 2 - Collector Sakti, District Sakti C.G. 3 - Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Sakti, District Sakti C.G. 4 - Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Sakti, District Sakti C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ramesh Nayak, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 & 2 : Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 19/08/2025 1. The limited grievance raised by the petitioner in the present writ petition for a direction to the respondent authorities to decide the pending representation dated 26.06.2025 of the petitioner within the stipulated time frame. SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.08.20 10:27:10 +0530 2 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is retired from the post of Assistant Grand-II from Janpad Panchayat, Dist- Sakti on 31.12.2021, though the services of the petitioner are pensionable as he is joined in the service in the year 1989 yet he has not been provided any pension after his retirement. He raised his grievance to the authorities on 26.06.2025 by filing the representation (Annexure-P/3) but the same has not been decided till date. Therefore, the authority may be directed to decide his pending representation dated 26.06.2025 in accordance with law. 3. On the other hand, learned State counsel opposes on merits, however, he would submit that it is for the Respondent No. 3 & 4 to take the decision on pending representation of the petitioner, however, if the representation is being forwarded to the State authorities for its consideration, they will take its decision without any further delay. 4. Considering the limited grievance made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of directing the Respondent authorities to decide the pending representation of the petitioner dated 26.06.2025 (Annexure-P/3) within 04 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order in accordance with law and applicable rules and circulars governing the fields. 5. The petitioner is directed to produce the copy of this order within two weeks from today to the respondent authorities. 6. With the aforesaid direction, the present writ petition is disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika