1 2025:CGHC:31605 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7009 of 2018 1 - Sandeep Kumar Dubey S/o Shri Suresh Kumar Dubey Aged About 30 Years R/o I-4, Shatabdi Nagar, Telibandha, Ravigram, P.S. Telibanda District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Urban Administration And Development Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur, P.S. Abhanpur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Director Department Of Urban Administration And Development H.O.D. Building D-Block, Fourth Floor Indravati Bhawan Naya Raipur, P.S. Abhanpur District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Managing Director Chhattisgarh Mandi Board Bij Bhawan G.E. Road, Telibandha, Raipur, Disrtict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Chief Executive Officer Naya Raipur Development Authority Paryavas Bhavan North Block Sector 19 Naya Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board (Cgvyapam) Sector 19, Kotara Bhantha, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Union Of India Through Secretary, Ministry Of Human Resource Development Department Of Secondary And Higher Education, Shastri Bhavan, New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi 7 - All India Council For Technical Education Through Chirman, All India Council For Technical Education, Nelson Mandela Marg Vasant Kunj SMT NIRMALA RAO -2- New Delhi., District : New Delhi, Delhi ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Shri Anubhav Vatsa, Advocate holding the brief of Ms. Deepali Pandey, Advocate. For Respondent/ State : Shri Vedant Shadangi, P.L. For Respondent No.3 : Shri Navoday Singh, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Yashwant Thakur, Advocate. For Respondent No.4 : Shri Anuroop Panda, Advocate. For Respondent No.6 : Ms. Shatabdi Bagchi, Advocate holding the brief of Shri Sumit Singh, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 09.07.2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the petition has become infructuous. 2. Taking into consideration the statement made by counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nimmi