APHC010617922018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 29510/2018 Between: Dr.K.Mahadevamma ...PETITIONER AND Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MADHAVA RAO NALLURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. C SINDHU KUMARI 2. RAMA CHANDRA RAO GURRAM The Court made the following: ORDER: The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioner seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: “.... to issue a writ order or direction more in the nature of Mandamus declaring the action of the Respondents 1 and 2 in issuing Proceedings ROC No.TTD-80021(31)/31/2018-DEO-SEC-TTD, dated 31.05.2018 ignoring the seniority of the petitioner and the Proceedings Roc.No.EDN1/9817/DEO/2011 dated 20.07.2018 as illegal, arbitrary, malafide and violative of Arts. 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and consequentially, to direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Principal in the institutions under their management as per seniority confirmed in Proceedings Roc.No.EDN1/9817/SerIII/2011 dated 31.01.2013 and 25.03.2013.” 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner would submit that the cause in this Writ Petition does not survive and has become infructuous. 3. Learned Standing Counsel for TTD appearing for respondents is in attendance. 2 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 29510 of 2018 25.03.2025 Mjl /*