APHC010615182014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH ATAMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2164 OF 2014 Revision filed under Sections 397 & 401 of Cr.P.G , aggrieved by the Order and Decree dated 11-08-2014 in M.G No. 131 of 2008 on the file of the Family Gourt -cum-IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada. Between: Shaik Ghouse Basha, Student, S/o. Late Shaik Mastn, aged about 36 years. Student, R/o. D.No. 12-2-213, Beside Madhava Swamy Temple, Pithapuram, East Godavari District. ...Petitioner/Respondent AND 1. Shaik Haleema, W/o. Shaik Goush Basha, aged about 32 years, D/o M.A.S. Kirmani, R/o. D.No. 16-9, Muzavr Street, Kondapalli Village Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, Drishba District. 2. Shaik Basha S/o Shaik Ghouse Basha, Aged about 8 years, student, (2nd respondent being minor rep., by her mother, The 1st respondent herein.) ...Respondents/Petitioners rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad For the State of Telangana and State ofA P. 3. The State of A.P. ...Respondent/Respondent :1 1 lA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLRCMP 3578 OF 2014 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order dated 11.08.2014 in M.C.No.131 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court -cum- IV Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada pending disposal of the Revision in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: Smt. M Shalini Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 & 2: Sri Subhani S M Counsel for the Respondent No.3: Public Prosecutor (AP) The Court made the following order: ,4-' j 'i i j .'r I ■•i ... • APHC010615182014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] FRIDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 21fi4/7nid Between; 1.SHAIK GHOUSE BASHA, E.G.DT.,, STUDENT, R/0. D.NO. 12-2-213 BESIDE MADHAVA SWAMY TEMPLE GODAVARI DISTRICT. PITHAPURAM, EAST ...PETITIONER AND 1.SHAIK HALEEMA KRISHNA 2 OTRS REP PP, D/0 M A S KIRMANI R/0. D.NO. 16-9 MUZAVR STREET, KONDAPALLI VILLAGE IBRAHIMPATNAM MANDAL, DRISHBA DISTRICT. 2.SHAIK BASHA S/0 SHAIK GHOUSE BASHA, AGED ABOUT 8 YEARS, STUDENT, (2ND RESPONDENT BEING MINOR REP., BY HER MOTHER, THE 1ST RESPONDENT HEREIN.) 3.THE STATE OF A P, REPT. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE TELANGANA AND STATE OF A.P. , HIGH OF ...RESPONDENT(S): CrPC praying that in the . filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto set aside the dated 11-08-2014 in M.C.No. 131 of 2008 on the file of the Family Court-cum- IV AddI District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada by allowing the Revision i the interest of justice and to pass any such other order in the case. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of the affidavit circumstances stated in order in or orders appropriate I lA NO: 1 OF 2014fCRLRCMP 3578 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of order dated 11.08.2014 in M.C.No. 131 of 2014 on the file of the Family Court - cum IV Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Vijayawada pending disposal of the Revision in the interest of justice and to pass any such other order or orders appropriate in the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.MSHALINI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.SUBHANISM 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: Sri S.M.Subhani, learned counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2 submits that Respondent No.2, the son of Respondent No.1 died. It is also submitted that the maintenance dispute between the petitioner and Respondent No.1 has been settled out of the Court and requests to dismiss the Criminal Revision Case. In view of the same, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed against Respondent No.1 and the Criminal Revision Case against Respondent No.2 is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order ^to 2. costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY RE^STRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Family Court -cum- IV Additional District and Sessions Judge; Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. One CC to Smt. M Shalini Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri Subhani S M Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CC’s to The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] . , 5. Two CD Copies SAM (gsg) HIGH COURT i DATED:04/07/2025 I. I T 1',; ■t ORDER CRLRC No. 2164 of 2014 I O ? 2 JUL 2025 ar m t: lO ton : t ^ Current Section j 1 i 1 •j-. i i DISMISSING THE CRLRC AGAINST RESPONDENT No.1 V I t DISMISSING THE CRLRC AGAINST RESPONDENT No.1 as ABATED ■'!. :i' 1 .1 i