[2025:RJ-JP:42219] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15502/2025 Shyam Sundar Jindal S/o Late Shri Jugal Kishore Gupta, Aged About 56 Years, R/o Banshi Ka Bagh, Keladevi Mod, Karauli, Presently Working As Teacher Grade-Iii Level-1 In Government Senior Secondary School, Langra. Block Mandrayal, District Karauli. (Employee Id Rjka199226021929) ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Collector Cum District Election Officer, Karauli, District Karauli. 2. The Electoral Registration Officer (Sdm), Sapotara, District Karauli. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sumit Choudhary Mr. Utkarsh Jindal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 14/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioner while referring order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. CW no. 13188/2025 Arvind Pankaj & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors, order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. [2025:RJ-JP:42219] (2 of 2) [CW-15502/2025] (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and accordingly this writ petition be disposed of. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioner and on perusal of judgment in case of Arvind Pankaj & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors(supra), Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) and Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ratio laid down in case of Ten Singh (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he has a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /75