Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37109 (PNJ)

STATE OF HARYANA v. NAND RAM

RSA/2375/1999 · 2025-05-15

Anil Kshetarpal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

103 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-2375-1999(O&M) Date of decision: 15.05.2025 STATE OF HARYANA ..Appellant Versus NAND RAM ..Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL Present: Ms. Vibha Tewari, AAG, Haryana. Mr. Adarsh Jain, Advocate for respondent. ANIL KSHETARPAL, J(Oral) 1. The defendant-State of Haryana assails the correctness of concurrent findings of fact arrived at by the Courts below while decreeing plaintiff’s suit for declaration to the effect that he is entitled to be promoted to rank of Pump Operator, Grade II with effect from 16.07.1982 along with payment of arrears of salary along with all consequential benefits. Both the Courts found that Sh. Chander Singh, a junior to the respondent was promoted in the year 1988 with effect from 16.07.1982, hence, the respondent was also entitled to be promoted. 2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the suit was filed on 09.01.1989 for grant of decree of declaration and hence, it was beyond the prescribed time. 3. This Court has considered the submissions of learned counsel for the parties. 4. The cause of action accrued to the respondent in the year 1988 when Sh. Chander Singh was promoted. MOHD AYUB 2025.05.16 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-2375-1999(O&M) -2- 5. Hence, no ground to interfere is made out. 6. Dismissed. 7. All the pending miscellaneous applications, if any, are also disposed of. May 15th, 2025 (ANIL KSHETARPAL) Ayub JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No MOHD AYUB 2025.05.16 16:17 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.