- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:332 WP No. 35385 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA WRIT PETITION NO. 35385 OF 2024 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SMT KUSUMA K S AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS, W/O HONNARAJU K, PRESIDENT KUDUR GRAMA PANCHAYAT, 5TH BLOCK, SHIVAGANGE ROAD, MAHATHANAGAR, MAGADI TALUK, RAMANAGARA DISTRICT 561101 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ANDANAPPA GURAPPA BALLOLLI., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ, AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, DR B R AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, M S BUILDING, BANGALORE 560001. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER RAMANAGARA SUB DIVISION, RAMANGARA TALUK ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE, 1ST FLOOR, B M ROAD, RAMANAGARA-562 159. Digitally signed by KIRAN KUMAR R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:332 WP No. 35385 of 2024 3. THE KUDUR GRAMA PANCHAYATH REPRESENTED BY PANCHAYATH DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, KUDURGRAMA PANCHAYATH MAGADI TALUQ RAMNAGAR DIST-561 101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA., AGA FOR R-1 & R-2; SRI. M.S.DEVARAJU., ADVOCATE FOR R-3) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUION OF INDIA., PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION BEARING NO. ELN/CR/06/2024-25 DATED 19.12.2024 FORM-2 ISSUED BY THE R-2 AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-A, ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA ORAL ORDER 1. On 18.12.2024, 16 members of the Panchayath submitted a requisition to the Assistant Commissioner to convene a meeting since they desired to move a motion of no confidence against the petitioner. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:332 WP No. 35385 of 2024 2. On receipt of the said requisition, the Assistant Commissioner has issued a notice dated 19.12.2024 for convening a special meeting on 07.01.2025. The petitioner being aggrieved by this notice, is before this Court. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that on receipt of the requisition, the Assistant Commissioner was required to give a notice to the petitioner, wait for ten days and only thereafter he could have convened the special meeting for moving of that resolution. 4. Section 49 of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 reads as under: “49. Motion of no-confidence against Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat.- (1) Every Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha of Grama Panchayat shall forthwith be deemed to have vacated his office if a resolution expressing want of confidence in him is passed by a majority of not less than two thirds of the total number of members of - 4 - NC: 2025:KHC:332 WP No. 35385 of 2024 the Grama Panchayat at a meeting specially convened for the purpose in accordance with the procedure as may be prescribed: Provided that no such resolution shall be moved unless notice of the resolution is signed by not less than one-half of the total number of members and at least ten days notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution: Provided further that no resolution expressing want of confidence against an Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha, shall be moved within the first fifteen months from the date of his election: Provided also that where a resolution expressing want of confidence in any Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha has been considered and negatived by a Grama Panchayat a similar resolution in respect of the same Adhyaksha or Upadhyaksha shall not be given notice of, or moved, six months from the date of the decision of the Grama Panchayat”. 5. As could be seen from the first proviso under Section 49, a motion for no-confidence cannot be moved unless that resolution is preceded by issuance of a - 5 - NC: 2025:KHC:332 WP No. 35385 of 2024 notice of the resolution, which is required to be signed by not less than one-half of the total number of the members is given and at least ten days notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution. This would therefore mean that after the notice of the intent to move the resolution is received, there must be a time gap of ten days between the date of the requisition and the date of the special meeting to be convened by the Assistant Commissioner. 6. The argument of the petitioner that the notice should be given to the petitioner and the Assistant Commissioner was required to thereafter wait for a period of ten days, is contrary to the proviso. 7. In am therefore of the view that there is no justification in entertaining this writ petition. This writ petition is therefore dismissed. 8. Learned counsel for the parties submit that in view of the interim order granted in this writ petition, the - 6 - NC: 2025:KHC:332 WP No. 35385 of 2024 meeting which is convened today has been adjourned. The Assistant Commissioner shall notify the members that the motion for no-confidence would be taken up on the date to be fixed by him pursuant to this order. This shall be done within a period of two weeks. Sd/- (N S SANJAY GOWDA) JUDGE GSR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 34