Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37105 (RAJ)

ROSHAN KATHAT v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/13548/2010 · 2025-09-17

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:38076-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13524/2010 Ramjan Khan S/o Shri Alladin Khan, Aged 21 years, R/o Near A Block, Chandravardai Nagar, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary to the Govt. Department of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Collector (Stamps), Circle Ajmer, Ajmer. 3. The Sub-Registrar (Ajmer-2), Department of Registration & Stamps, Village Bhunabai, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. ----Respondents Connected With D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13547/2010 Ramjan Khan S/o Shri Alladin Khan, Aged 21 years, R/o Near A Block, Chandravardai Nagar, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary to the Govt. Department of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Collector (Stamps), Circle Ajmer, Ajmer. 3. The Sub-Registrar (Ajmer-2), Department of Registration & Stamps, Village Bhunabai, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. ----Respondents D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13548/2010 Roshan Kathat S/o Shri Subedar Ismail Kathat, Aged 37 years, R/o Junjhara Ka Badia, Beawar, Distt. Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan through its Secretary to the Govt. Department of Finance, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Collector (Stamps), Circle Ajmer, Ajmer. 3. The Sub-Registrar (Ajmer-2), Department of Registration & Stamps, Village Bhunabai, Jaipur Road, Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : None present For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanvisha Pant HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 17/09/2025 [2025:RJ-JP:38076-DB] (2 of 2) [CW-13524/2010] 1. No one is present on behalf of the petitioners. 2. These are the old cases pertaining to year 2010. It is appearing that learned counsel for the petitioners is no more interested in pursuing these matters. 3. Accordingly, the instant writ petitions are dismissed in default. 4. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J SAHIL SONI /14-16