Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37096 (RAJ)

MANOJ MEGHWAL S/O SHRI MOTILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10668/2025 · 2025-11-06

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:44476] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10668/2025 Manoj Meghwal S/o Shri Motilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Maa Chamunda Temple, Dhakad Khedi, P.s Udhyog Nagar, Kota City (Raj.). (Accused At Present Confined In Central Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Samarth Sharma For Respondent(s) For Complanint(s) : : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Mr. Nitin Kumar Sharma HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 06/11/2025 1. The petitioner has filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.336/2025 registered at Police Station Udhyog Nagar, District Kota City for offence under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 110, 3(5) of BNS 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that though the petitioner has been named in the FIR but no specific act has been assigned to him. He argued that allegation of causing injury by using the sticks are on co-accused Anmol Meghwal and Banti Chakla. He again submits that the petitioner is behind the bars since 27.07.2025 without any criminal past. The [2025:RJ-JP:44476] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10668/2025] trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody and the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Manoj Meghwal S/o Shri Motilal, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J bmg/51