Amrik Chand & anr. Vs. NIIC Ltd. & ors. CMP(M) No.1771 of 2025 11.12.2025 Present: Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate vice Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Suri, Advocate, for the applicants-appellants. Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate, for respondent No.1. Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, for respondents No.2 and 3. CMP(M) No.1771 of 2025 The present application has been filed on behalf of applicants-appellants under Section 5 of the Limitation Act for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. The application is duly supported by an affidavit of applicant No.1. 2. Reply to the application has been filed on behalf of respondent No.1/Insurance Company, wherein, prayer for dismissal of the application has been made. 3. Heard. Having regard to the averments made in the application, which is duly supported by an affidavit of applicant No.1, this Court finds sufficient cause to condone the delay of 30 days that has occurred in filing the present appeal. 4. Consequently, the application is allowed and the delay of 30 days that has occurred in filing the appeal, is condoned. 5. The application stands disposed of. FAO No.______/2025 (FAOST No.49156/25) 6. Appeal be registered. 7. Heard. Admit. 8. Ms. Kamakshi Tarlokta, Advocate and Ms. Manjeet Kaur, Advocate, vice Mr. Naveen K. Bhardwaj, Advocate, accept service of post admission notice on behalf of respondent No.1 and respondents No.2 and 3, respectively. 9. Calls for the records. List for final hearing in due course. ( Sushil Kukreja ) Judge December 11, 2025 (V.Himalvi)