Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37095 (RAJ)

SAJNA DEVI W/O TEJARAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/14924/2025 · 2025-11-18

Sameer Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:46538] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 14924/2025 1. Sajna Devi W/o Tejaram, Aged About 63 Years, R/o Ahir Ka Baas Police Station Dantaramgarh District Sikar. 2. Surji Devi W/o Panna Ram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Ahir Ka Baas Police Station Dantaramgarh District Sikar. 3. Sita Devi W/o Govind Ram, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Ahir Ka Baas Police Station Dantaramgarh District Sikar. 4. Gokul W/o Madan Lal, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Ahir Ka Baas Police Station Dantaramgarh District Sikar. ----Accused-Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Non-Applicant For Applicant(s) : Mr. Shivam Sharma for Mr. Harendra Singh For Non-Applicant(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 18/11/2025 1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS in connection with FIR No. 90/2024 registered at Police Station Dantaramgarh District Sikar for the offence(s) under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 323 and 341 of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicants has submitted that the instant matter pertains to Section 101 BNS, whereby physical altercation occurred inter se parties, due to which cross FIRs were made to be registered. It is further submitted that applicants are four females, out of which two are senior citizens, aged about 63 and 60 years respectively, and others are aged about 45 and 50 years respectively. It is further submitted that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicants and they are ready to abide by the conditions, if any, imposed by this Court. [2025:RJ-JP:46538] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-14924/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the instant bail application. 4. Having heard the contentions made by the counsel representing both the parties, considering that there are no criminal antecedents against the applicants, upon a perusal of the material available on record, and on account of applicants being females, this Court is inclined to allow the anticipatory bail application. 5. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Dantaramgarh, District Sikar in F.I.R. No. 90/2024 is directed that in the event of arrest of the accused-applicants Sajna Devi W/o Tejaram, Surji Devi W/o Panna Ram, Sita Devi W/o Govind Ram & Gokul W/o Madan Lal, they shall be released on bail, provided they furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the applicants shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/369