Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37094 (JHR)

BANARJEE GOPE v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./9391/2025 · 2025-12-09

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:36891 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B. A. No. 9391 of 2025 Banarjee Gope, aged about 57 years, son of Late Deshuva Gope, resident of Village- Sonaposi, P.O.- Maluka, P.S.- Jagarnathpur, District- West Singhbhum. …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand …. Opp. Party ------ CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Raj Kumar Verma, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Ms. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. ----- 3/ 09.12.2025 Heard the parties. 2. Petitioner has been made accused in connection with Special POCSO Case No. 12 of 2025 corresponding to Jagannathpur P.S. Case No. 11 of 2025, for the offences registered under Section 65(2) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 4 and 6 of the POCSO Act and charge has been framed for the offences under Sections 65(2) of the B.N.S. and Sections 6 and 5(m) of the POCSO Act, pending in the Court of learned Additional Sessions Judge-II- cum-Special Judge, POCSO Act Cases, West Singhbhum at Chaibasa. 3. The petitioner is alleged to have raped the seven years old victim. 4. It was submitted that the petitioner is the grandfather of the victim in relation. It was further submitted that the medical board, which was constituted for examination of the victim, have found no injury on the person of the victim. 5. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is rejected. (Ambuj Nath, J.) R.Kr. 09.12.2025 / Uploaded on 10.12.2025