Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37093 (RAJ)

MITHUN S/O LATE SHRI SUGAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/15246/2025 · 2025-12-09

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:49999] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 15246/2025 Mithun S/o Late Shri Sugan, Aged About 30 Years, Resident Of House No. 151, Kacchi Basti, Tila No. 7A, Jawahar Nagar, Police Station Jawahar Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) ( At Present Accused Confined In Central Jail Jaipur) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Agrawal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 09/12/2025 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.441/2025 registered at Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, District-Jaipur City (East) for offences under Sections 305(a) and 331(4) of BNS. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the allegation against the present petitioner is for theft of the ornaments from the house of the complainant. It is further submitted that though 20 cases are pending against the present petitioner but in all cases he has been bailed out. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.08.2025. Charge-sheet has been filed. The trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, no [2025:RJ-JP:49999] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-15246/2025] fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, hence, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner-Mithun S/o Late Shri Sugan be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall mark his presence before the SHO, Police Station Harsora District KotputliBehror in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. [2025:RJ-JP:49999] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-15246/2025] (iii) that the petitioner shall not repeat any such offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR ),J Arun/117