[2025:RJ-JP:47881] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5727/2018 1. Karun Singh Yadav S/o Shri Hoshiyar Sing Yadav, R/o Village Garhi, Tehsil Mundawar, Post Shyopur, Distt. Alwar Raj. 2. Rakesh Kumar S/o Shri Lalaram Yadav, R/o Village Garhi, Tehsil Mundawar, Post Shyopur, Distt. Alwar Raj. 3. Satyapal Yadav S/o Shri Bodan Ram, R/o Village Bhojpuri, Tehsil Mundawar, Distt. Alwar Raj. 4. Manoj Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Ramkumar Yadav, R/o Village Bhikhawas, Post Chandpur, Tehsil Mundawar, Distt. Alwar Raj. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary To The Government, Medical And Health Department, Secretariat, Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Jaipur Rajasthan. 3. The Additional Director Admn, Medical And Health Services Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur Raj.. 4. The Director, National Health Mission Nhm, Medical And Health Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Jaipur. 5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer, Alwar, Distt. Alwar Raj. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Singodiya For Respondent(s) : Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 26/11/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioners with the following prayer:- [2025:RJ-JP:47881] (2 of 3) [CW-5727/2018] “i) The impugned inaction of respondents whereby the candidature of the petitioner has been rejected on the ground that the petitioner has not completed his Bridge Course may kindly be held illegal and arbitrary and the respondents be directed to consider the candidature of the petitioners for giving appointment on the post of GNM with all consequential benefits.” 2. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon the judgment dated 19.12.2018 delivered in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors., submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein has already been settled by the Co- ordinate Bench of the Principal Seat at Jodhpur and the aforesaid judgment has been affirmed by Hon’ble the Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors. on 15.09.2025. He further submits that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with the judgment dated 19.12.2018 which was affirmed on 15.09.2025. 3. Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC puts appearance on behalf of the respondents-State and does not dispute the aforestated facts. 4. Considered the grievance raised herein. 5. The petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all the grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioners with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from the date of its receipt. After passing the order on the representation, the [2025:RJ-JP:47881] (3 of 3) [CW-5727/2018] respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they are at liberty to approach the High Court with fresh petition. 6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J Shruti /11