[2025:RJ-JP:40946] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9211/2022 Nandram Pari S/o Shri Pema Ram Khatik, Aged About 63 Years, Resident Of Rajgarh, Tehsil Rajgarh, District Alwar (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Treasurer, District Treasury, Dausa (Raj.). 3. Assistant Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Sub Division Bandikui, District Dausa. 4. District Collector, Alwar (Raj.). 5. District Collector, Dausa (Raj.). 6. Directorate, Pension And Pensioners Welfare Department, Rajasthan, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kuldeep Aswal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Shubham Gupta for Mr. Rahul Lodha, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025 1. Considered submission of learned counsels for the parties and perused the material placed on record. 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel for respondent submits that only at the request of present petitioner, the amount (outstanding dues) of ₹2,25,267/- were deducted. He has submitted calculation-sheet of housing loan taken by present petitioner. [2025:RJ-JP:40946] (2 of 2) [CW-9211/2022] 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submits that he has already deposited ₹1,75,000/- amount against housing loan and same has not been adjusted by the department or the concerned authority. He submits that a liberty be granted to him to file a representation about excess recovery made by the Department or the concerned authority and if any grievance is still subsisting after disposal of representation, the petitioner be given a liberty to take action, as advised. 4. Having considered aforesaid, the instant writ petition is disposed of as petitioner is not entitled for any relief, however, a liberty is granted to him to file a representation about alleged excess payment made by him against housing loan. In case, a representation is filed within two weeks by petitioner, same be decided within four weeks from date of receipt of representation and if still any grievance is subsisting, the petitioner is at liberty to take appropriate action, as advised legally to him. 5. With aforesaid, the instant writ petition with pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J GAURAV /109