IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 110 BHUMIKA AND ANTOHER STATE OF PUNJAB CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. Present : Mr Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab MANISHA BATRA 1. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India official respondents the hands of respondent dated 15.03.2025 ( 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner 15.03.2025 before the S.H.O., Police Station Kasturba, KSM Road, Rajpu Patiala (Annexure P petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has thereon. He further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to Superintendent filed by the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP No. Date of decision: BHUMIKA AND ANTOHER Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANISHA Mr. Durga Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab **** MANISHA BATRA, J. (oral) The present petition has been filed under Article 226 Constitution of India seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing official respondents No.1 to 3 to protect the life and liberty of the petitioner the hands of respondents No. 4 to 6 and to take action on dated 15.03.2025 (Annexure P-5). At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioners have recently filed a representation on before the Senior Superintendent S.H.O., Police Station Kasturba, KSM Road, Rajpu Annexure P-5) raising their grievances as petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has further submitted that at this stage, the satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to of Police, District Patiala to decide the aforesaid representation filed by the petitioners and take necessary action thereon. IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH No.2804 of 2025 Date of decision: 21.03.2025 …. Petitioners Versus …. Respondents MANISHA BATRA , Advocate for the petitioners. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab. The present petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the seeking issuance of a writ of mandamus directing the to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners at take action on their representation At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on Superintendent of Police, District Patiala and S.H.O., Police Station Kasturba, KSM Road, Rajpura Town, Rajpura, District grievances as mentioned in the present petition but the same has not yet been considered and no action has been taken further submitted that at this stage, the petitioners would be satisfied if appropriate directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior decide the aforesaid representation necessary action thereon. of the the at their representation has recently filed a representation on District Patiala and ra Town, Rajpura, District in the present been taken be Senior decide the aforesaid representation Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP 3. Notice of motion. 4. Ms. Ruchi Court, has accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent that the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to h 5. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide representation period of 15 days law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide and liberty. 21.03.2025 Jyoti-IV CRWP No.2804 of 2025 Notice of motion. Ms. Ruchika Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab accepted the notice on behalf of the respondent the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the paperbook be supplied to her during the course of the In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioner commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide dated 15.03.2025 (Annexure P 15 days from today, by passing a speaking order in law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the respondents would provide them adequate security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No. Whether reportable : Yes/No No.2804 of 2025 -2- ka Sabherwal, Sr. D.A.G., Punjab, who is present in accepted the notice on behalf of the respondents-State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the during the course of the day. In view of the limited prayer made by the petitioners, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, the present petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction to respondent No. 2 to decide the aforesaid Annexure P-5) of the petitioners within a from today, by passing a speaking order in accordance with law. Needless to say, if any threat is found to the petitioners, the official security in order to protect their life (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No. Yes/No who is present in State and submits the needful will be done in due course. Let a complete set of the , without disposed the aforesaid within a accordance with , the official security in order to protect their life Jyoti 2025.03.24 10:22 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document