Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:71538 Court No. - 69 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 2766 of 2025 Applicant :- Yashpal And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Balram Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
1. Heard counsel for the applicants, Sri Neeraj Kumar Sharma, learned A.G.A. for the State- opposite party and perused the material placed on record. 2. This application has been filed seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 142 of 2019, under Sections 420, 467, 468 I.P.C., Police Station Sirauli, District Bareilly. 3. Counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants have been falsely implicated in the instant case. The alleged loan amount was repaid by the applicants and the loan account was closed by the concerned bank. In this regard reliance has been placed on the certificate dated 18.03.2021 issued by the concerned bank. The applicants have not forged or manipulated any documents. At this stage there is no credible evidence to link the applicants with the offence. The applicants have no criminal antecedents. It is next submitted that the investigation is going on and the applicants have apprehension of their arrest in the above mentioned case. 4. Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail but could not satisfactorily dispute the aforesaid submissions from the record. 5. Counsel for the applicants further submits that the application for grant of anticipatory bail be confined only till the submission of police report. 6. Having regard to the submissions made by learned counsel for the applicants, considering the nature of accusations, antecedents of the applicants and the fact that at this stage, there is no substantive evidence to link the applicants with the offence, without commenting on merits of the case, I am of the opinion that
the applicants are entitled to be enlarged on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report. 7. In the event of arrest, the applicants- Yashpal and Amarpal be released on anticipatory bail in the aforesaid case crime till the submission of police report, if any, under Section 173 (2) Cr.P.C., on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.
50,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:- (i) The applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) The applicants shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the
facts of the case so as to dissuade from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer; (iii) The applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passports, the same shall be deposited by them, before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
8. In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.
9. The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a copy of this order independently without being prejudiced by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.
10. The applicants are directed to produce a copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
11. The application stands disposed of.
Order Date :- 5.5.2025 Manish Kr Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- MANISH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad