[2025:RJ-JP:40899] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15353/2025 1. Prashant Tiwari S/o Hargovind Tiwari, Aged About 33 Years, Resident Of 2B5, 1A14 New Jail Road, New Housing Colony, Jhalawar (Raj.) 2. Tushar Tripathi Son Of Shri Manoj Kumar Tripathi, Aged About 24 Years, Resident Of Santosh Sadan, Akhade Ki Gali, Jhalarapatan, Jhalawar (Raj.) 3. Deepash Joshi Son Of Shri Dinesh Kumar Joshi, Aged About 35 Years, Resident Of House No. B220, Bherupura Chandarvati Colony, Jhalarapatan, Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Chief Electoral Officer, State Election Commission, Government Secretariat, Jaipur, (Raj.) 2. District Election Officer (Collector), Jhalawar (Raj.) 3. District Education Officer, Elemetary Education, Jhalawar, District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Praveen Poshwal For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 08/10/2025 1. Learned counsel for petitioners while referring order dated 01.09.2025 in S.B. CW no. 13188/2025 Arvind Pankaj & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors, order dated 04.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13367/2025 (Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and order dated 23.09.2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14524/2025 (Vinita Kumari Vs. [2025:RJ-JP:40899] (2 of 3) [CW-15353/2025] The State of Rajasthan and Ors.) and submits that the controversy raised herein is squarely covered by an order passed by a Co-ordinate bench of this Hon’ble Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur in case of Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12975/2025) and accordingly this writ petition be disposed of. 2. Having considered the submission of learned counsel for petitioners and on perusal of judgment in case of Arvind Pankaj & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors(supra), Bharat Singh Yadav Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra), Vinita Kumari Vs. The State of Rajasthan (supra) and Ten Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan (supra), this writ petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to file a fresh representation within a period of 4 weeks from today. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to respondents within a period of four weeks from now raising all grounds. The respondents are directed to decide the representation with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 4 weeks from date of receipt of representation, in light of ration laid down in case of Ten Singh (supra). After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have a right to re-approach the Court with fresh petition. 4. Accordingly, this writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed. [2025:RJ-JP:40899] (3 of 3) [CW-15353/2025] (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /52