- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5550 WP No. 35195 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 4TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR WRIT PETITION NO. 35195 OF 2024 (GM-FC) BETWEEN: MR. MUNAL SANTRA, AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS, S/O MR S.P.SANTRA, R/A: FLAT NO.215, MBR STEEPLE, DEVARACHIKKANAHALLI, BEGUR MAIN ROAD, BANGALORE - 560 068. …PETITIONER (BY SRI MANJUNATH H., ADVOCATE) AND: MRS. SONAM DUTTA, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS W/O MR MUNAL SANTRA EMPLOYED AT: NATWEST GROUP INDIA (FORMELY RBS TECHNOLOGY SERVICES INDIA), 8TH FLOOR, BUILDING NO.2, TOWER A, CANDOR INFOSPACE, SECTOR 21, GURUGRAM, HARYANA - 122 002. ALSO RESIDES AT: FLAT 5C, SHREE GANAPATI APARTMENT, JHEEL BAGAN, HATIARA, KOLKATA-WEST BENGAL - 700 157. ALSO RESIDES AT AIR VIEW COMPLEX (EAST), ITI MORE, P.S. ENGLISH BAZAR, MALDA-WEST BENGAL, PIN: 732 101, MOB: 8867562320/ 7892916765/ 9434468415 Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5550 WP No. 35195 of 2024 EMAIL: SONAM.DUTTA@GMAIL.COM. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT.GEETHA MISRA, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUAHS AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 16.12.2024 ON I.A.NO.60 IN G AND WC NO.141/2017 PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE HON'BLE III ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL JUDGE, FAMILY COURT AT BENGALURU I.E., ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL ORDER Learned counsel for the petitioner has filed a memo, which reads as under: "The Counsel for Petitioner beseeches this Hon'be Court to dispose of the instant WP since the Respondent has made the said WP infructuous for the following reasons: 1) The Respondent was served with the Order dated 24/12/2024 passed by this Hon'ble Court however she never challenged the said Order. 2) The Respondent was also given the liberty for modification of the said Order, however the Respondent did not take any action. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5550 WP No. 35195 of 2024 3) The Respondent did not bother to come for the visitation with the child in BMC despite this Hon'ble Court granting her permission for visitation and neither did she respond to the SMS sent by Petitioner and hence making the child wait in BMC unnecessarily. Hence, this Hon'ble Court be pleased to dispose off the said Case as infructuous." 2. Copy of the said memo has been served on the learned counsel for respondent, who does not have objection for the same. In view of the memo and submission made by both the learned counsels, the petition is dismissed for having become infructuous. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN CT: BHK