Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37080 (AP)

Indian Oil Corporation Limited, v. M/s. Sreenivasa Oil Corporation,

WA/753/2017 · 2025-02-28

Dhiraj Singh Thakur, Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

> 2>^ w. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATj^ FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, CHIEF JUSTICE O I o o Ot AND HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT APPEAL NO: 753 OF 2017 Writ Appeal under clause 15 of the Letters Patent Appeal against the order dated 20.03.2014 in WP No.28334 of 2007 on the file of the High Court. Between: 1. Indian Oil Corporation Limited, Marketing Division, Visakha Divisional Office, 8*'' Floor, LIC Building, Visakhapatnam - 530 004, Represented by its Senior Divisional Retail Sales Manager 2. The Appellate Authority - Indian Oil Corporation Limited, (Marketing Division) Indian Oil Bhavan, G-9, Ali Yavar Jung Marg, Bandra (East), Mumbai -400 051. ...APPELLANTS/RESPONDENTS - Executive Director, (Retail Sales), cum AND M/s. Sreenivasa Oil Corporation, Indian Oil Dealers, Seripalli, Ganapavaram Mandal, W.G.District, Rep. by its Partner B.Ramachandra Rao ...RESPONDENT/WRIT PETITIONER I.A. NO: 1 OF 2017(WAMP. NO: 1471 OF 20171 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dated:20.03.2014 WP No.28334/2007, pending disposal of the Writ Appeal. passed in r / Counsel for the Appellants: SRI ASHOK RAM V Counsel for the Respondent: SRI M, SIVARAM representing SRI N. SIVA REDDY The Court made the following: JUDGMENT T T -x APHC010616182017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH Sr.No:-2 AT AMARAVATI [3483] WRIT APPEAL NO: 753 of 2017 Indian Oil Corporation Limited and others ...Appellants Vs. M/s Sreenivasa Oil Corporation ...Respondent ********** Advocate for Appellants Advocate for Respondent Mr. Ashok Ram V Mr. M. Sivaram representing Mr. N Siva Reddy CORAM :THE CHIEF JUSTICE DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI : 28**’ February, 2025 DATE PC : Learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter is rendered infructuous. The Writ Appeal is, accordingly, disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- V.DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// ^nofTcOFFICER SEC To, 1. One CC to Sri Ashok Ram V, Advocate [OPUC] 2. One CC to Sri N. Siva Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 3. Three CD Copies. ssb ' ;<• HIGH COURT DATED:28/02/2025 JUDGMENT oFANb75^;jf^ X 12 MAR 2025 , Curreni oecuon NJ^SPATCV'®^^ WA.No.753 of 2017 o‘ DISPOSING OF THE W.A AS INFRUCTUOUS WITHOUT COSTS