Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 3708 (RAJ)

DIPANSHU MEENA S/O LATE SHRI RAMDHAN MEENA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/784/2025 · 2025-01-31

Ganesh Ram Meena

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:4444] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 784/2025 Dipanshu Meena S/o Late Shri Ramdhan Meena, Aged About 20 Years, R/o Village Aatarda, Police Station Karwar, District Bundi. (Presently Lodged At Central Jail, Jaipur Rajasthan). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 1231/2025 Anil Kumar Bairwa S/o Shri Munshi Lal, Aged About 22 Years, R/o Bairwa Mohalla, Village Sundar Nagar, Indragarh, P.s. Indragarh, District Bundi. (At Present Confined In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohar Pal Meena Mr. Kishal Lal Meena For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE GANESH RAM MEENA Order 31/01/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS, in connection with FIR No.740/2024, registered at Police Station Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 305(a) & 331(3) of BNS. [2025:RJ-JP:4444] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-784/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the accused- petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel further submits that co-accused namely; Vishnu Bharti has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024. Counsel also submits that the accused-petitioners are in custody for last more than one month. Therefore, the accused- petitioners may be released on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. Taking into consideration the overall facts and circumstances of the case and more particularly the fact that co-accused namely; Vishnu Bharti has already been enlarged on bail by this Court vide order dated 12.12.2024 and the accused-petitioners are in custody for last more than one month, this Court so as to maintain the parity but without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the petitioners on bail. 6. These bail applications are, accordingly, allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners shall be released on bail provided each of them shall furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court or any other Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when [2025:RJ-JP:4444] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-784/2025] called upon to do so. 7. The Registry is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (GANESH RAM MEENA),J DIVYA SAINI /417-418