APHC010616532005 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12799/2005 Between: T.Prasada Reddy, Gajuwaka (p), Visakhapatnam. The AP Genco, rep by its Chairman Vidyut Soudha Hyd and another Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P SRIDHAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. E URMILA The Court made the following order: Sri P.Sridhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through virtual mode and submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned standing counsel for present. Recording the submission Petition is dismissed as infructuous. cause in the Writ Petition still survives, he can file appropriate application within a period of two (2) months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 08.04.2025 MP IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12799/2005 T.Prasada Reddy, Gajuwaka (p), Visakhapatnam. ...PETITIONER AND The AP Genco, rep by its Chairman Vidyut Soudha Hyd ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: Counsel for the Respondent(S): made the following order: P.Sridhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. Sri Nagaraju Naguru, learned standing counsel for respondents is cording the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner Petition is dismissed as infructuous. However, if the petitioner feels that the cause in the Writ Petition still survives, he can file appropriate application months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) P.Sridhar Rao, learned counsel for the petitioner appeared through submitted that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. respondents is of learned counsel for the petitioner, the Writ However, if the petitioner feels that the cause in the Writ Petition still survives, he can file appropriate application months. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 56 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 12799 OF 2005 Dated:08.04.2025 MP