RAHUL TIWARY @ MONU TIWARII @ RAHUL TIWARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6579/2025 · 2025-11-24
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37077 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37077 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:35052 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No. 6579 of 2025
Rahul Tiwary @ Monu Tiwari @ Rahul Tiwari, aged about 33 years, Son of Anand Kumar Tiwary, resident of Bagan Para, Harindanga Bazar, Pakur, P.O.- Pakur, P.S.- Pakur (Town), District- Pakur … Petitioner
-Versus- The State of Jharkhand
… Opposite Party
-----
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
-----
For the Petitioner : Mr. Pankaj Verma, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Fahad Alam, A.P.P.
-----
02/24.11.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.43 of 2025, registered for the offence under Sections 191(1), 191(3), 190, 303(2), 331(4), 324(4) 74 and 351(2) of the BNS, 2023 read with Section 27 of the Arms Act, pending in the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur.
3.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is falsely implicated in this case, there are case and counter case. He also submits that the allegations of firing are there against Sumanto Das and Milan Mandal. He then submits that petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in para-22 of the petition.
4.
Learned counsel appearing for the State opposed the prayer and submits that petitioner is not co-operating in the investigation.
5. Looking into the FIR, it transpires that the there is general and omnibus allegations against the petitioner. The allegations of firing are there against Sumanto Das and Milan Mandal. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, as disclosed in para-22 of the petition.
6. Regard being had to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.
2025:JHHC:35052 2
Accordingly, the above-named petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within three weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrender, he will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Pakur in connection with Pakur (Town) P.S. Case No.43 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Dated: 24th November, 2025 Simran/