G.SRINIVASLU , v. GURRAM MEENA KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS,
CRLRC/66/2009 · 2025-08-06
T Mallikarjuna Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37075 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37075 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010617022009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: Between:
1. G.SRINIVASLU ,, S/O G.RANGAIAH, TEACHER, R/O D.NO. 6/385, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA DISTRICT. 1. GURRAM MEENA KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O G.SRINIVASULU, PRIVATE SERVICE, REP. BY ITS HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN R1, R/O D.NO. L.I.G.83, HOUSING BOARD COLONY,
2. G SAI RAGHU RAM, S/O G. SRINEVASULU, STUDENT, REP. BY ITS HIS MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN R1, R/O D.NO. L.I.G.83, HOUSING BOARD COLONY,
3. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD. Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto passedby thelearned Judge Family Cout, Kadapa inM.C.NO. 12/2008 IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 99 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 66 OF 2009 G.SRINIVASLU ,, S/O G.RANGAIAH, TEACHER, R/O D.NO. 6/385, SANKARAPURAM, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND GURRAM MEENA KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O G.SRINIVASULU, PRIVATE SERVICE, REP. BY ITS HIS MOTHER & GUARDIAN R1, R/O D.NO. L.I.G.83, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, G SAI RAGHU RAM, S/O G. SRINEVASULU, STUDENT, REP. BY ITS HIS MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN R1, R/O D.NO. L.I.G.83, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., AT HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto setasie theorder passedby thelearned Judge Family Cout, Kadapa inM.C.NO. 12/2008 IA NO: 1 OF 2009(CRLRCMP 99 OF 2009 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO G.SRINIVASLU ,, S/O G.RANGAIAH, TEACHER, R/O D.NO. 6/385, ...PETITIONER GURRAM MEENA KUMARI AND 2 OTHERS, W/O G.SRINIVASULU, NATURAL GUARDIAN R1, R/O D.NO.
L.I.G.83, HOUSING BOARD COLONY, G SAI RAGHU RAM, S/O G. SRINEVASULU, STUDENT, REP. BY ITS HIS MOTHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN R1, R/O D.NO. L.I.G.83, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PUBLIC ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the setasie theorder passedby thelearned Judge Family Cout, Kadapa inM.C.NO. 12/2008 that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to
stay the proceedings in M.C.NO. 12/2008 on the file of Family court, Kadapa ,pending disposal of the Criminal Revision IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to recall the new warrant issued against at the petitioner dt 05/03/2025 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N V R AMARNATH Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following:
ORDER:-
This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 01.12.2008 passed in M.C.No.12 of 2008 passed by the learned Family Judge, Kadapa.
2. Heard. Perused the record.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the change of circumstances the petition has become infructuous and requested to dismiss the petition.
4. Considering the submissions made, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed.
____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 07.8.2025 TJN
203 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 66 OF 2009 Dated: 07.8.2025 TJN
HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 66 OF 2009 PROCEEDING SHEET
SL. NO. DATE
ORDER OFFICE NOTE
06.
07.8.2025 TMR, J
The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J TJN