[2025:RJ-JP:42587] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16165/2025 Shyam Lal Sharma S/o Shri Bhura Mal Sharma, Aged About 70 Years, R/o Ward No. 26, Near Sita Ram Ji Mandir. Reengus, District Sikar. Retired On 30.08.2014 From The Post Of Ayurved Compounder From Government Ayurvedic Hospital, Simrala- Jagir, District Sikar. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Ayurved Department, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director, Directorate Of Ayurveda, Rajasthan, Ajmer. 3. Additional Director, Ayurved Department, Division Jaipur, (Ayush Bhawan), Sector 26, Pratap Nagar Jaipur 4. Deputy Director, Ayurved Department, Sanwali Road, Sikar 5. Officer Incharge, Government Ayurved Hospital A Shreni, Mau, Tehsil Sri-Madhopur District Sikar ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vijay Pathak For Respondent(s) : Mr. Bhuwnesh Sharma, AAG with Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 16/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this writ petition may kindly be allowed and by or an appropriate writ, order direction, the respondents may kindly be directed to quash the adverse entries (Annexure-2) made in the APARS of the petitioner and the petitioner be granted 2nd and 3rd selection scales on completion of 18 [2025:RJ-JP:42587] (2 of 2) [CW-16165/2025] and 27 years of service from the date of his initial appointment and accordingly the petitioner's pay be re-fixed, his pension be revised and the arrears whereof be given to him alongwith interest @ 12% p.a. Any other appropriate order or direction, which this Hon'ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts of the present case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue raised in the present writ petition is squarely covered by order dated 21.09.2023 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.6500/2009 titled as Krishna Kant Tiwari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. and the present matter may be decided in light of the same. 3. Learned AAG does not dispute the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Having considered the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, which is not disputed by learned AAG, the present writ petition is disposed of in light of the order dated 21.09.2023 passed in the case of Krishna Kant Tiwari Vs. The State of Rajasthan and Ors. (supra). 5. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J MR/295