P.C.Lalthlamuana v. Sh Lalramhmachhuana and 7 Ors.
FAO/3/2025 · 2026-07-29
Michael Zothankhuma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3707 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 3707 (GAU) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC030001602025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : FAO/3/2025 P.C.Lalthlamuana S/o Keiaia (L), Bethlehem Vengthlang, Aizawl, Mizoram
VERSUS Sh Lalramhmachhuana and 7 Ors. S/o R.Khawvelthanga, R/o Keifang Venghlui, Aizawl District, Mizoram 2:Sh Lalnunmawia
3:Sh R.Liantluanga
4:Sh Sanghlira Colbert
5:Sh R.Lalliana s/b Sh. Ngaihkhama Ralte
6:Sh C.Robuanga
7:The Superintendent Engineer
8:The Executive Enginee Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr Zoramchhana Advocate for the Respondent : Mr. C Lalhruaitluanga for R4
Page No.# 2/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MICHAEL ZOTHANKHUMA
ORDER 30.07.2026
Heard Mr. Zoramchhana, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. T. Lalzekima, learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 and Mr. Zodinpuia Hnamte, learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2, 3, 5 & 6. Mr. Zoramchhana, learned counsel for the appellant prays that he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal. Keeping in view the Order dated 19.05.2015 passed by the learned Trial Court in Civil Suit No. 51/2014, which states that the defendant No. 1 was present in the Court, the prayer of the appellant’s counsel is allowed. The appeal is accordingly dismissed, as withdrawn. Send back the Trial Court Record. It is needless to add that the appellant can challenge the impugned
Judgment & Order passed by the learned Trial Court, as per law, but not on the
Page No.# 3/3 ground that he had not received the summons issued by the learned Trial Court.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant