Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37069 (RAJ)

VINOD KUMAR SHARMA S/O. BRAJMOHAN SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/6270/2025 · 2025-10-13

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:41569] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6270/2025 Vinod Kumar Sharma S/o. Brajmohan Sharma, Aged About 58 Years, R/o. 4/76, Housing Board, Tonk Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Food And Consumer Affairs, Government Of Rajasthan, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Chairman, Institute Of Banking Personnel Selection, Ibps House, D.p. Road, Thakur Complex, Kandivali, Mumbai, India. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Akshaya Yadav For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 13/10/2025 1. This writ petition has been filed by petitioner with following prayers: “I. It is, therefore, humbly prayed that your lordships may graciously be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and the interview of the petitioner in pursuant of the advertisement dated: 09.11.2024 for recruitment on the post of Judicial/Non Judicial Members of the State Consumer Commission and President/ Member of the District Consumer Commission shall be conducted again in a fair and transparent manner strictly in accordance with law. II. Any other order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and [2025:RJ-JP:41569] (2 of 2) [CW-6270/2025] proper, be also passed in favour of the Petitioner.” 2. During course of arguments, learned counsel submits that petitioner has secured good marks in written examination but due to some ulterior reasons his candidature was not considered at the time of interview process and deliberately he was awarded lesser marks as compared to his written marks, which resulted into non- selection of petitioner. He submits that an opportunity be granted to file a representation to raise the grievances pointed by him. 3. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioner is given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents- Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to consider and decide the representation after enquiry about grievances, raised by the petitioner but with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioner either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioner has provided E-mail in his representation. If the petitioner is still aggrieved, he is at liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition. 4. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /13