Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37064 (PAT)

Suresh Thakur v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./25451/2025 · 2025-05-02

Ashok Kumar Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.25451 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1031 Year-2024 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Suresh Thakur S/o Shivchandra Thakur Resident of Vill- Bhikhanpur, P.S.- Ahiyapur, District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Brahmaputra Singh Ishu, Advocate Ms. Poonam Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 2 02-05-2025 Heard Mr. Raju Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, learned APP for the State and Mr. Brahmaputra Singh Ishu and Ms. Poonam Kumar, learned counsels for the Informant. 2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 329(4) 352(3)(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. 3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with the others started abusing the informant and his family members due to the previous land dispute. It is specifically alleged against the petitioner that he assaulted with farsa on the head and nose of the informant. Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25451 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 2/3 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner and the informant are neighbors. They are having land dispute between themselves. It has also been submitted that the petitioner has also filed two complaint cases against the informant and others. From the provision of the impugned order, it transpires that the doctor has found the following injury on the person of the informant:- (i) Non-displaced fracture of bilateral nasal bones and bony nasal septum with evidence of haemosinus (ii) Mild scalp haemotoma in the left frontal region (iii) Minimal subarachnoid haemorrhage along the left fronto-temporal cortical suicl. The nature of the first injury seems to be grievous. 5. Learned counsel for the informant Mr. Brahmaputra Singh Ishu has vehemently opposed the bail. He has submitted that the informant has suffered grievous injury. The petitioner is custody since so and so. 6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Ahiyapur P.S. Case No.1031 of 2024 on furnishing bail bond of Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.25451 of 2025(2) dt.02-05-2025 3/3 Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Muzaffapur. sharun/- (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) U T