Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 37061 (ALL)

AKARAM v. STATE OF U.P. AND 2 OTHERS

WRIB/1333/2025 · 2025-04-09

Chandra Kumar Rai

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:52581 Court No. - 50 Case :- WRIT - B No. - 1333 of 2025 Petitioner :- Akaram Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Tripathi,Shashank Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Kumar Rai,J. 1. Heard Mr. Shashank Tripathi, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Hari Mohan Srivastava, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant petition has been filed for the following relief:- "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no.2/ Consolidation Officer Badlapur District Jaunpur to decide the case No. Restoration/1330 Poonam Vs. Gaon Sabha under Section 9A (2) of the U.P.C.H. Act relating to Village Jamaitha, Pargana Haveli, Tehsil Sadar, District Jaunpur, within stipulated period specified by this Hon'ble Court." 3. Counsel for the petitioner submitted that time barred restoration application filed on behalf of the petitioner is pending before respondent no.2, Consolidation Officer Badlapur Jaunpur. He submitted that appropriate direction be issued for expeditious disposal of pending restoration application. 4. I have considered the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records. 5. There is no dispute about the fact that restoration application filed by petitioner is time barred. 6. No case for expeditious disposal of time barred restoration application is made out. Writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 10.4.2025 Vandana Y. Digitally signed by :- VANDANA YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad