V V y ii IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3202 OF 2023 Petition under Section 115 of CPC allow the Civil Revision Petition by setting aside the Impugned Order dated 17-10-2023 in E.P No. 45 of 2022 in O.S No. 10 of 2020 Court, Ongole, Prakasam District. on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge Between: Reddy, Hindu, aged about Prakasam^District’ Engineering College. Kurnool Road, 61 Ongole, ...J.D.R./Revision Petitioner AND Kota Sarojanamm^ W/o. (late) Narayana Rao, Hindu, aged about 77 D^trtct Street, Kandukur Town and Mandal years, Prakasam ...D.H.R/Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the operation of Impugned Order dated 17-10-2023 passed against Revision Petitioner in E.P No. 45 of 2022 in O.S No. 10 of 2020 on the file of Additional Senior Civil Judge Court, Ongole, Prakasam District. \ lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Between: >^ta Sarojanamma, W/o. (late) Narayana Rao, Hindu, aged about 77 years 'fe ° street, Kandukur Town and Mandal PrakS M ■ r ■ ■ .f ...Petitioner/Respondent AND veare^^Chlirrman 'p’ 61 P?lkasamDisfrfct’ Engineering College, Kurnool Road, Ongole, ...Respondent/Revision Petitioner Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed Dt. 13.12.2023 of 2023. in CRP.No.3202 Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. GHANTA SRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI K.V. VIJAYA KUMAR The Court made the following ORDER: 1 APHC010613432023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] FRIDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 3202/2023 Between: ...PETITIONER Yallaturi Ramakrishna Reddy AND ...RESPONDENT Kota Sarojanamma Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.GHANTASRIDHAR Counsel for the Respondent: 1.KVVIJAYA KUMAR 2 The Court made the following order: It is represented by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 2. The submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous application pending, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA ASSISTANT REGISTRAR 1: //TRUE COPY// (^SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Additional Senior Civil Judge Court, Ongole, Prakasam District. 2. One CC to SRI. GHANTA SRIDHAR Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to SRI. K V VIJAYA KUMAR Advocate [OPUC] 4. Three CD Copies Chp nm HIGH COURT DATED;20/06/2025 ORDER CRP.No.3202 of 2023 DISMISSING THE CRP AS INFRUCTUOUS