IN THE HIGH 115 Sohan Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. respondents to revise the pension and gratuity of the petitioner correctly under the 6 increment awarded to junior employees. 2. raised in the present petition and 22.01.2025, submitted, which ha prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 3. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sohan Singh Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Dhirinder Kumar Saldi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for directing the respondents to revise the pension and gratuity of the petitioner correctly under the 6th Punjab Pay Commission by taking into account the increment awarded to him w.e.f. 1.10.2012 ployees. Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, detailed representations dated 20.09.2024 and 22.01.2025, Annexures P-26 and 27, respectively, have submitted, which have yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the erits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-7940-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 25.03.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Amarpeet Singh Bains, AAG, Punjab. present petition is for directing the respondents to revise the pension and gratuity of the petitioner correctly Punjab Pay Commission by taking into account the w.e.f. 1.10.2012 and restore pay parity with Learned counsel would contend that regarding the claim representations dated 20.09.2024 26 and 27, respectively, have been yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the erits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.26 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-7940-2025 -2- the respondents to decide the representations dated 20.09.2024 and 22.01.2025, within a period of 4 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 25.03.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.03.26 10:45 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.