HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 10659 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE NEERAJ TIWARI, J. HON'BLE VIVEK KUMAR SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Present writ petition has been filed for execution of will deed dated 4.11.1987. 3. At the very outset, learned Standing Counsel raised objection and submitted that for execution of will deed, there is a separate provision under law and for that writ petition may not be maintainable. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner could not dispute the aforesaid fact. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to approach the Competent Authority for execution of will deed in accordance with law. October 8, 2025 A.P. Pandey Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Prashant Shukla, Ram Prakash Upadhyay Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Vivek Kumar Singh,J.) (Neeraj Tiwari,J.) Bhaskar Prasad Jaiswal .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANAND PRAKASH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad