[2025:RJ-JP:10867] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 791/2025 1. Premraj @ Akaash S/o Prahlad, Aged About 23 Years, Resident Of Regar Mohalla Dhanwada Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar (Raj.) 2. Devendra @ Guddu S/o Chhittarlal, Aged About 22 Years, Resident Of Regar Mohalla Dhanwada Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar District Jhalawar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Kumawat For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 10/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested in connection with FIR No.362/2024 registered at Police Station Kotwali Jhalawar, District Jhalawar for the offences under Sections 143, 323, 341, 504, 427 & 308 of IPC. Later on, police filed charge-sheet for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 341, 504, 427, 308, 147, 148, 149 & 325 of IPC. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that other co-accused persons have been granted bail by learned trial court. It is submitted that petitioners [2025:RJ-JP:10867] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-791/2025] are in custody since 10.12.2024. Further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. Charge-sheet has been filed and trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners. She submits that petitioners are habitual offenders as other cases have been registered against them. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, as also considering the material available on record in the form of charge-sheet and the fact that other co-accused persons have been granted bail by learned trial court as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting upon the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – (1) Premraj @ Akaash S/o Prahlad, & (2) Devendra @ Guddu S/o Chhittarlal, shall be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. [2025:RJ-JP:10867] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-791/2025] 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /207