ALOK MUKHARJEE S/O LATE SHREE MADAN NARAYAN GOSWAMI v. CHANDRAKALA SAINI W/O SHREE GAJENDRA KUMAR SAINI
CW/1750/2025 · 2025-10-14
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37049 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 37049 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:41870] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1750/2025 Alok Mukharjee S/o late Shree Madan Narayan Goswami, aged about 64 Years, R/o House No- 2695, Rasta Shivdas Ji Ka, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus Chandrakala Saini W/o Shree Gajendra Kumar Saini, R/o House No- 2986, Dhannamali Ki Gali, Bagruwalon Ka Rasta, Dusra Chauraha, Chandpol Bazar, Purani Basti, Jaipur. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avinash Vyas For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA
Order 14/10/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the learned Rent Tribunal, Jaipur Metropolitan-II to decide the eviction petition No.375/2023 expeditiously.
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a senior citizen having age of 64 years and the eviction petition is pending before the Tribunal for its adjudication since 2023, so appropriate directions be issued to the learned Tribunal to decide the said eviction petition within a period of three months.
3. Heard and considered the submissions made at the Bar and perused the material available on the record.
4. The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Sangram Sadashiv Suryavanshi vs. State of Maharashtra1 while relying on the 1 2024 SCC Online SC 3526
[2025:RJ-JP:41870] (2 of 2) [CW-1750/2025] constitutional Bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in High Court Bar Association, Allahabad vs. State of U.P.2, has deprecated the practice of the Courts of issuing directions to the subordinate Courts to decide the matter in a timeline.
5. The aforesaid directions, as prayed for, cannot be issued by this Court. But looking at the fact that the petitioner is a senior citizen having the age of 64 years; the case is pending before the learned Trial Court for its adjudication since 2023. Therefore, it is expected from the learned Tribunal to make all possible endeavours to decide the eviction petition expeditiously while ensuring that no unnecessary and unreasonable request for adjournment is entertained.
6. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of.
7. All pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-17 2 2024 INSC 150