IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 210 RSA-663-2000 (O&M) Date of Decision: 09.04.2025 RANDHIR SINGH …..Appellant Vs. LAKHVIR SINGH AND ANOTHER …..Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK GUPTA Present: None. ****** DEEPAK GUPTA, J. (ORAL) On 02.07.2024, the following order was passed by this Court:- Noce to Mr. H.S. Diwana, Advocate, through whom this appeal has been filed could not be issued as his Membership has been removed as per Bar Directory. Noce issued to the appellant received back with the report that he has since expired, as reported by the registry. Till date, no applicaon has been filed for bringing on record his legal heirs/representaves. As per memo of pares, appellant, since deceased, was resident of village Mandaur, Tehsil & District Fatehgarh Sahib. Registry is directed to send a noce at the address menoned in the memo of pares to the appellant and serve them through the concerned process server by taking assistance of the concerned Sarpanch/Panch/Numberdar of the village where the appellant is stated to be residing. The said order be sent to the District & Sessions Judge concerned, for necessary compliance. Noce to Mr. B.P.S. Virk, Advocate, who was represenng the respondents was duly sent but there is no representaon on his behalf. In these circumstances, noce to respondents be also issued for the date fixed. Adjourned to 25.09.2024. PRIYANKA 2025.04.09 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document RSA-663-2000 (O&M) -2- Today, it is reported by the Registry that the deceased sole appellant has two sons, one is residing in Canada and the other has refused to accept the no$ce. The address of son of the appellant who is residing in Canada is not available. The other son, who has refused to accept the no$ce, has not come forward so as to pursue this appeal. Nobody else has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances, this Court is le( with no op$on but to dismiss the present appeal for want of prosecu$on, making it clear that the legal representa$ves of the appellant will be at liberty to get it revived, in case any cause of ac$on s$ll survives. ( DEEPAK GUPTA ) 09.04.2025 JUDGE pry Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No PRIYANKA 2025.04.09 15:33 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document