APHC010614652018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2244 OF 2018 Between: Boppana Surendra, S/o.Nagabhushanam, aged about 35 R/o.D.No.34, Sin Enclave, Nagarjuna Nagar, Vijayawada, presently in California, USA. Rep.by GPA Boppana Nagabhushanam. years. ...Petitioner/AI AND 1. State of Andhra Pradesh, through Inspector of Police, Pattabhipuram Guntur, Rep. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court of AP at Amaravati. ...Respondent/Complainant 2. Chimmiri Anusha, D/o.Hanumantha Rao, aged 30 years, H.No.1-6-3/N, Brundavanam, Opp.Mahila Polytechnic College, Gujjanagundia, Guntur, A.P., Rep by GPA holder Chimmiri Vasundhara, W/o.Hanumantha Rao, aged 48 years R/0.H.N0.1-6-3/N, Polytechnic College, Gujjanagundia, Guntur, A.P. Brundavanam, Opp.Mahila ...Respondent Revision filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.PC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may be pleased to set-aside the Order dated 18.07.2018 passed in Crl.M.P.No.1558 of 2018 in C.C.No.237 of 2018 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways, Guntur, Guntur District and allow the CrI.MP. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri V.S.R. Anjaneyalu Counsel for the Respondent No.1 lAssistant Public Prosecutor Counsel for the Respondent No.2: Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao The Court made the following: APHC010614652018 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2244/2018 Between: 1 BOPPANA SURENDRA, R/0.34. SIRI ENCLAVE. NAGARJUNA NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, PRESENTLY IN CALIFORNIA, USA. REP.BY GPA BOPPANA NAGABUSHANAM ] ANUSHA, D/0 HANUMANTHA RAO, 30 YRS.GUNTUR GPA CHIMMIRI VASUNDHARA, W/0 HANUMANTHA R 2.CHIMMIRI REP BY GUJJANGUNDLA GUNTUR.A.P. ...PETITIONER(S) AND OF AP, through Inspector of Police, Pattabhipuram, Rep.by the Public Prosecutor.High Court at Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT THE Guntur, / Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1.MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO 2.VS RANJANEYALU Counsel for the Respondent: 1.MUMMANENI SRINIVASA RAO 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: i The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the matter has become infructuous as the main case i.e., C.C. No.237 of 2018 on the file of the learned Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways, Guntur ended in acquittal on 31.12.2018. , was 2. In view of the disposal of the main case itself, nothing remains in this Criminal Revision Case for further adjudication. 3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- M RAMESH BABU DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// To, 1. The Judicial Magistrate of First Class for Railways, Guntur, Guntur District. 2. The Station House Officer, Pattabhipuram Police Station, Guntur District. 3. One CC to Sri V.S.R.Anjaneyalu, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri Mummaneni Srinivasa Rao, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CC's to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravati [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies BSV nm ... HIGH COURT DATED:03/07/2025 ORDER CRLRC NO. 2244 OF 2018 2 2 SEP 2025 Trent vS oof O dismissing the criminal revision AS INFRUCTUOUS CASE WITHOUT COSTS